Legal Opinion
State v. Peck
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1927No. 20605. Department TwoPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellants, Peck, Peterson and Pavich, were convicted of a violation of the liquor laws. The information upon which the conviction was had (omitting the more formal parts) reads as follows:
“Count I.
“Comes now the prosecuting attorney in and for Spokane county, state of Washington, and charges the defendants, Archie Peck, Jack Peterson and Joe Pavich, with the crime of bootlegging, committed as follows:
“That the said defendants, Archie Peck, Jack Peterson and Joe Pavich, in Spokane county, state of Washington, on or about the 21st day of October, 1926, then and there being, did, then and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Foley v. YuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. KingsburyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. HiteshewWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. HurlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.