Legal Opinion

State v. Knight

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1930No. 21593. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The defendants were charged by information with the crime of bootlegging. The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty as charged as to one and a verdict of guilty of liquor in possession as to the other. Separate judgments were entered, and each defendant appeals.

In submitting the case to the jury, the trial court gave an instruction as follows:

“You are instructed that, under the laws of this state, in any prosecution for the alleged crime of bootlegging, proof of possession of intoxicating liquor other than alcohol upon the part of any person shall be prima facie evidence that said liquor was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. HurlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. HodgesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. GleenWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RouwWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. EbelWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. RoblinWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API