Legal Opinion
Smith v. Allbaugh
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2019No. 17-5095PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORITZ, Circuit Judge.
Antonio Smith appeals the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the district court's order and remand for further proceedings.
Background
Smith pleaded guilty in Oklahoma state court to drug trafficking, possessing a firearm as a felon, and a variety of related charges. Smith's habeas claims center around a plea offer that one of Smith's attorneys allegedly didn't communicate to him. Essentially, Smith says that he rejected a plea offer from the state that his first attorney presented to him, under which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Eaton v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. KearnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Andrew Miller v. Pavestone, LLC, and Quikrete Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- Bongiovanni v. City and County of Denver/ProbationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Burnett v. PettigrewDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.