Legal Opinion

Harris v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 10, 1997No. 96-5091PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

This ease requires the court to decide what course the District Court should take when a party raises the affirmative defense of statute of limitations for the first time in a dispositive motion, rather than in a responsive pleading as required by Rule 8(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellant Geraldine Harris (Geraldine Harris Coombs at the time of the events in question) sued Appellee Department of Veterans Affairs (“Department”) for racial discrimination under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1994).…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Richardson, Roy Dale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Michael Massey and John Otten, M.D. v. David HelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Woodruff, Phillip v. Peters, MaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  5. John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API