Hoey v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam BIRD, Judge.
James Harold Hoey, appellant, was charged by the State with possession of a controlled substance and with possession of drug paraphernalia. In a pretrial motion to suppress evidence, he contended that these charges resulted from a search and seizure that violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The trial court denied the motion, and Hoey entered a conditional plea of guilty pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3, reserving a right to appeal the adverse ruling. He was sentenced to seventy-two months in the Arkansas Department of Correction for the controlled-substances conviction and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Wofford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Burris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Cain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Bratton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Mays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001