Legal Opinion

Hoey v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 2001No. CA CR 00-707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam BIRD, Judge.

James Harold Hoey, appellant, was charged by the State with possession of a controlled substance and with possession of drug paraphernalia. In a pretrial motion to suppress evidence, he contended that these charges resulted from a search and seizure that violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The trial court denied the motion, and Hoey entered a conditional plea of guilty pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3, reserving a right to appeal the adverse ruling. He was sentenced to seventy-two months in the Arkansas Department of Correction for the controlled-substances conviction and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Wofford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Burris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Bratton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Mays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API