Legal Opinion
People v. Cribas
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 1991No. G009230PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.
Cesar Elias Cribas was convicted by a jury of rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), 1 bribery of witnesses (§ 137, subd. (a)), and conspiring with his brother, Danilo, to bribe witnesses (§ 182). He asserts a tape-recorded conversation between him and the victim was admitted in violation of the mandates of the United States Supreme Court in Massiah v. United States (1964) 377 U.S. 201 [12 L.Ed.2d 246, 84 S.Ct. 1199], and contained statements which were involuntary. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the bribery-related convictions.
I
In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. RussoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. GodinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. AlleyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.