Legal Opinion

People v. Godinez

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1993No. B067906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.

Jose Godinez appeals from judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder, and found to be true allegations that he personally used a firearm and that the crimes were committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with, a criminal street gang, under Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(2).

In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that a jury need not be unanimous on a particular overt act for purposes of conspiracy. We also hold that a defendant’s sentence cannot be enhanced…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re BaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. RussoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. OlguinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. DuranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API