Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 6, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 89-0040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of special action relief. The state filed a motion in limine to determine the admissibility of the breath test administered to the appel-lees in order to permit the state to use the results at trial. The appellees filed motions to suppress. After taking evidence the magistrate denied the state’s motion to permit the use of the intoxilyzer breath results at trial. The state then filed a complaint for special action relief in the superior court which eventually affirmed the magistrate.

FACTS

In December 1987, appellees were arrested for driving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McNutt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Scales v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dean v. City CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. VannoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. State v. KempArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State v. KempCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API