Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1990No. CV-89-0440-PRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
We address the admissibility of certain Intoxilyzer results. Defendant Edward J. Davis filed a petition for review asking this court to review a court of appeals decision in this matter. See State ex rel. Dean v. City Court, 163 Ariz. 366, 788 P.2d 99 (Ct.App.1989). Defendants Mark Wilson and James Balkow filed notices of joinder. The state filed a cross-petition for review. We granted review under Rule 23, Ariz.R. Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTS
Defendants 1 were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNutt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Scales v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. VelascoArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- MacK v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Guthrie v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Moss v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.