Legal Opinion
Aero Corp. v. Department of the Navy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-2944PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
I
This case involves the claim of plaintiff, Aero Corporation (“Aero”), that the determination of defendant, Department of the Navy (“Navy”), to make a sole-source award of a contract to perform the Service Life Extension Program (“SLEP”) on twenty C-130 aircraft to Lockheed-Georgia Company (“Lockheed") was improper. Aero also seeks mandamus to compel the Navy to refer the question of Aero’s capability to perform the contract for determination by the Small Business Administration.
Aero filed this action on October 30, 1979, four days after filing a bid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Kentron Hawaii, Ltd. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Wheelabrator Corp. v. ChafeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Reichenberg v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1970
- Cessna Aircraft Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McKay v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Aero Corp. v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Aero Corp. v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc. v. GoldschmidtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.