Legal Opinion
Aero Corp. v. Department of the Navy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 26, 1982No. Civ. A. 79-2944PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Introduction
There is before the Court the ongoing dispute arising from claims by Aero Corporation, now supported by opinions 1 of the Acting Comptroller-General released June 5, 1981, and September 9, 1981, that the Department of the Navy has violated its duties under the Armed Services Procurement Act (“ASPA”), 10 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2737, and Section 3 of the Armed Services Procurement Regulations (“DAR”), see 32 C.F.R. parts 1-39 (vol. 1). The specific provision of ASPA that plaintiff claims defendant has violated is 10 U.S.C. § 2304(g), which creates a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Latecoere International, Inc. v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Filtration Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.