Legal Opinion

Aero Corp. v. Department of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 16, 1983No. Civ. A. 79-2944PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

This is the final chapter of this protracted litigation 1 in which plaintiff has challenged the Navy’s decision to award contracts for the C-130 aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) to the Lockheed-Georgia Corporation (“Lockheed” or “LGC”) without competition. 2 Plaintiff is an aerospace firm with ten years of experience in performing maintenance on C-130’s, as defendant’s contractor for Standard Depot Level Maintenance (SDLM) for its C-130 fleet. 3 Plaintiff alleges that the Navy was legally obligated to conduct a competition for its SLEP…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nepera Chemical, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Synanon Foundation, Inc. v. BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Fontaine Davis, Eric H. Washington Jerilyn North Robert L. Demmons Jimmie Braden Audry Lee Early Davis Brandi Swanson Susan Moorehead Anne Young Mary M. Carder Theresa Rodigou Kathleen J. Bradshaw Patricia Murray International Association of Black Firefighters-San Francisco Chapter United States of America v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation John W. Flaherty Edward E. Murphy William M. Shaughnessy Alfred E. Smyth San Francisco Firefighters, Local 798, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. United States of America, and Fontaine Davis, in Intervention/appellees v. City and County of San Francisco v. San Francisco Firefighters Local 798, in Intervention/appellant (Four Cases). Fontaine Davis v. City and County of San Francisco v. San Francisco Firefighters Local 798, in Intervention/appellant (Three Cases). Fontaine Davis v. City and County of San Francisco v. San Francisco Firefighters Local 798, in Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API