Wilson v. Samuels
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Defendant Samuels was the owner of a lot of land in San Francisco. He entered into a written contract with W. A. Van Dervort, the other defendant, by the terms of which the latter was to construct for him certain buildings upon said lot. The contract was duly filed with the recorder of the city and county.
Plaintiff Wilson furnished materials and labor to the contractor for and in the construction of the buildings, for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Covell v. WashburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Humiston v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reynolds v. Pennsylvania Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Pioneer Minerals Corp. v. Larabie Bros. Bankers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Massey v. Del-Valley Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Schroeder v. PissisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Corn Exchange National Bank v. CurtissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.