Covell v. Washburn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The action is to recover the reasonable value of labor done and materials furnished by plaintiff, at defendant’s request, in the building of a house for defendant, alleged to be $2,500, of which $560 are admitted to have been paid, and judgment is demanded for the balance, — $1,940.
The plaintiff recovered judgment for the sum of $423.15, with costs, but appeals from the judgment, on the judgment roll, and claims that upon the facts found by the court he is entitled to judgment for an additional sum of $187.15.
The findings show that there was a written contract between the parties…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Clancy v. PloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Marchant v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Combs v. EberhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Macomber v. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.