Legal Opinion

Corn Exchange National Bank v. Curtiss

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 4, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Axel Chytbaus, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

The dispute between the parties to this appeal is based upon the following written guarantee, set forth in haec verba in the Bank’s declaration, viz:

“Chicago, Illinois, March 17, 1903.

For value received and for the purpose of enabling Curtiss, Williams Co. to obtain credit of the Corn Exchange National Bank of Chicago, we hereby guarantee the prompt payment at maturity or thereafter of any and all indebtedness, either as principal or endorser, now dué or which may hereafter become due, from said Curtiss, Williams Co., to the Corn Exchange National Bank of Chicago, to the extent of - dollars,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drummond v. Executors of PrestmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Dobbin v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Taussig v. ReidIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Swisher v. DeeringIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Castle v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API