Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Pennsylvania Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1907No. L.A. No. 1492PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This cause was certified to this court "upon the disagreement of the justices of the district court of appeal of the second district. While the action was pending before that court the following opinion was prepared by Judge York, justice pro tem., called in for the purpose of the hearing and decision of this case. That opinion is hereby adopted as the opinion of this court, and its completeness renders unnecessary any further elaboration of the questions presented.

“This action was prosecuted by plaintiff and appellant to obtain a judgment against defendant and respondent upon a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Knight v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kullman v. GreenebaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Wilson v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Boteler v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API