Thomas v. Witte
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The defendants appeal from two judgments in which the law and the facts are identical or parallel. Although an order of consolidation of the two suits was made in the trial court, separate findings and judgments were entered. Counsel for all parties stipulated that the cases be consolidated on appeal. There is a duplication of most of the parties plaintiff and defendant in the two suits, and the same basic factual elements appear in both; the decision of one necessarily controls the disposition of the other.
The essential question to be determined is whether or not, over the opposition of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Warner v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- De Roulet v. MitchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Odstrcil v. McGlaunCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Sutter v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- American Medical International, Inc. v. FellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- LEG INVESTMENTS v. BoxlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pine v. TiedtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Heber v. YaegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.