Legal Opinion
Ekblade v. Anderson
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 17, 1969No. File 116564PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, J.
The plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant, seeks to recover in negligence from the latter for injuries allegedly received in a single vehicle accident.
By the instant motion, to which the plaintiff objects, the defendant seeks to amend his answer by adding to the previously alleged special defenses of assumption of risk and contributory negligence these additional special defenses: “3. The defendant has paid the plaintiff the sum of $521.50 for medical expenses alleged to have been incurred by the plaintiff on account of the alleged injuries. 4. Any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ora Greene Hudson, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Hudson, Deceased v. David Lazarus, Samuel Juster and Calvin JusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Coyne v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Gunter v. LordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Hawayek v. SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Goodwin v. GiovenelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rametta v. StellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lange v. RaefCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Gidius v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1974
- Rametta v. StellaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989