Legal Opinion

Rametta v. Stella

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 25, 1989No. 7275PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The defendants, Conrad A. Stella (Stella) and Stella Insurance Agency (agency), appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding the plaintiff *224$60,300 in damages for the defendants’ failure to procure an insurance policy on the plaintiff’s property. The defendants do not contest the issue of liability, but rather appeal only the award of damages. They claim that the trial court’s judgment is erroneous because the plaintiff suffered no damages as a result of the defendants’ negligence or as a result of the defendant agency’s breach of contract.

The trial court made the following findings of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ora Greene Hudson, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Hudson, Deceased v. David Lazarus, Samuel Juster and Calvin JusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Murray Grayson and Southern Freightways, Inc., a Corporation v. Earold E. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. Ursini v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. United Aircraft Corp. v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rametta v. StellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Rametta v. StellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API