Legal Opinion
Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 23, 2014No. 14-5193UnpublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
This action stems from a broken contractual relationship. Plaintiff Milan Express Co., Inc. (“Milan”), a Tennessee corporation seeking workers’ compensation insurance coverage, entered into a Reinsurance Participation Agreement (“Agreement”) with defendant Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc. (“Applied Underwriters”). Applied Underwriters is organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands and has its principal place of business in Omaha, Nebraska. During the three-year term of the Agreement, a dispute arose regarding payment of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Daniel v. Green v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Nitro-Lift Technologies, L. L. C. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Minnieland Private Day School, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- De Angelis v. Icon Entm't Grp. Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Danley v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Nielsen Contracting, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.