Legal Opinion

Nitro-Lift Technologies, L. L. C. v. Howard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 26, 2012No. 11-1377PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Per curiam

State courts rather than federal courts are most frequently called upon to apply the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA or Act), 9 U. S. C. § 1 et seq., including the Act’s national policy favoring arbitration. It is a matter of great importance, therefore, that state supreme courts adhere to a correct interpretation of the legislation. Here, the Oklahoma Supreme Court failed to do so. By declaring the non-competition agreements in two employment contracts null and void, rather than leaving that determination to the arbitrator in the first instance, the state court ignored a basic tenet of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. D.A. Osguthorpe Family Partnership v. ASC Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Mehdi Noohi v. Toll Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Kevin Ferguson v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API