Legal Opinion

Danley v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2017No. 16-1670UnpublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants purchased plaintiffs’ stale debts and attempted to collect, in addition to the debts, post-“eharge off’ interest. In this action, plaintiffs claim that this practice violates federal and Michigan debt-collection laws. Based on arbitration provisions contained in plaintiffs’ various account agreements, the district court compelled the parties to arbitrate, ruling that the agreements were enforceable and that the parties expressly authorized—via a delegation clause—an arbitrator to consider plaintiffs’ various “gateway” challenges to the arbitration provisions.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Nicole Swiger v. Joel RosetteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  3. De Angelis v. Icon Entm't Grp. Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  4. Mounts v. Midland Funding LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
  5. Ford v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API