Legal Opinion

State v. Shawn P.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1993No. 59585-2, 60037-6PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, C.J.

Facts of Case

The issue in these three consolidated appeals is whether the mandatory revocation of driving privileges, which is imposed upon minor teenagers who are convicted of consuming or possessing alcohol, violates the equal protection guaranties of our state and federal constitutions. We hold the revocation provisions in Washington's "abuse and lose" statutes1 constitutionally sound.

*556Juvenile offender Shawn P. was found guilty of violating the law prohibiting minors from consuming alcohol.2 He was 16 years old at the time of the offense and 17 when the disposition order was entered in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. City of Dallas v. StanglinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API