Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2013No. DA 12-0247PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Brenda Bailey and J. Stanley Bailey, Jr. (the Baileys) appeal from an order of the Ninth Judicial District Court, Glacier County, granting summary judgment to State Farm and Mark Olson (Olson) on the Baileys’ claims that State Farm and Olson negligently failed to secure underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage for the Baileys. We reverse the District Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of State Farm and Olson, and remand for further proceedings.

ISSUES

¶2 The Baileys raise the following two issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment when it found no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Henricksen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Newbury v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Featherston Ex Rel. Featherston v. Allstate InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fillinger v. Northwestern Agency, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Montana Department of Revenue v. Priceline.Com, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Horace Mann Insurance v. HankeMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hein v. Sott HomesMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Arnone v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In Re the Estate of MeadMontana Supreme Court · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API