Legal Opinion

United States v. Longworth

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 7, 1967No. Crim. 11181PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS AND OPINION

HOGAN, District Judge.

The defendant was indicted for refusing induction. A jury was waived. The defense is that the classification order of the Draft Board and the Board of Appeals, based on which the order of induction was issued, was invalid.

Findings of Fact

1. Defendant William F. Longworth, born August 21, 1942, registered for the draft at the appropriate time and, for purposes of this case, was classified 1-A by the appropriate Draft Board.

2. He married Shirley Ann William prior to 1965 and lived with her as man and wife until on or about July 5, 1966.

3. On April 14,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clinton Roy Petrie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Leon Leonard Mizrahi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Magaro v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Shook v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1969
  5. United States v. David Bruce AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API