Legal Opinion

Shook v. Allen

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 7, 1969No. C 69-618PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION INCLUDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER

LAMBROS, District Judge.

On August 11, 1969, the petitioner, Joel Robert Shook, filed a writ of habeas corpus in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 et seq. On the same day, this Court issued an order to show cause to the respondents, Colonel Arthur Allen and Stanley R. Resor. A hearing on this order was held on September 4, 1969. After considering the petitioner’s selective service file, this Court makes the following findings of fact and law:

The petitioner first registered with his Local Board…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Richard Glenn Keene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. Russell FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. BurlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Magaro v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Craig Joseph StacerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. David Paul BenderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. Brede v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1969
  5. Clark v. Commanding OfficerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API