Legal Opinion
S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles Flynn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1956No. 14431Published
1Opinion of the Court
230 F.2d 695
S. H. P. VEVELSTAD, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a corporation, Appellants,
v.
E. Miles FLYNN, Appellee.
No. 14431.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
January 13, 1956.
Rehearing Denied March 5, 1956.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED R. E. Robertson, Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, Juneau, Alaska, for appellants.
Faulkner, Banfield & Boochever, Norman C. Banfield, H. L. Faulkner, Juneau, Alaska, George F. Ward, John F. Dore, Seattle, Wash., for appellees.
Before HEALY, POPE and FEE, Circuit Judges.
POPE, Circuit Judge.
1
The appellee, as plaintiff in the court below, had…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Lange v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Vedin v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Flynn v. VevelstadDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.