Legal Opinion

Lange v. Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1906No. 1,295PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

This action was commenced in the District Court for the District of Alaska, Third Division, for the purpose of determining that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession of certain mineral lands, to which the defendants assert an adverse claim. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by the plaintiff the defendants moved for a dismissal of the action upon the ground that the plaintiff had failed to show that he had any legal or equitable estate in the land described in the complaint, and for the further reason that it was not shown that he was in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  2. Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Mike & Starr Gold & Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. King v. Amy & Silversmith Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Western Standard Uranium Company v. ThurstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Charlton v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  5. Hallenbeck v. KleppeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API