Jankovsky v. Halladay Motors
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McINTYRE
Action was brought by Tim K. Jankovsky, a minor, to disaffirm a contract allegedly entred into with Halladay Motors. Summary judgment was granted by the district court to Halladay Motors, and Tim Jankov-sky has appealed.
We find no dispute in the pertinent facts and hence no genuine issue of fact to be tried. Findings of fact are often considered unnecessary, if not out of place, in connection with summary judgments. See 3 Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1242, p. 201 (Rules Edition). In this instance however, the trial court has made lengthy findings of fact, which we…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Pacheco v. Continental Casualty CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hatfield v. Board Of County Commissioners For Converse CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Roth v. First Security Bank of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Torrey v. TwifordWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Davis v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Worley v. Wyoming Bottling Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.