Pacheco v. Continental Casualty Company
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE
Action was brought in the district court by Floyd Pacheco to recover from Continental Casualty Company on an accident and sickness insurance policy. It is the contention of plaintiff that he is entitled to recover under the accident provisions of the policy from the time of his alleged accident and as long as his disability lasts.
The contention of defendant, the insurer, is that plaintiff’s original claim was based upon sickness and that all payments provided for under the policy have been paid. The trial court found there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and granted summary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Pickett v. Assocciates Discount Corp. of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Star Transfer Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Amundson v. MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASS'N.Utah Supreme Court · 1962
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association v. Warren G. BrunkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jankovsky v. Halladay MotorsWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
- Century Surety Company v. Jim Hipner, LLC and Huey BrockWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Century Surety Company v. Jim Hipner LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Jankovsky v. Halladay MotorsWyoming Supreme Court · 1971