State ex rel. Delk v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order to sue*189cessfully challenge the Industrial Commission’s determinations as to the extent of a claimant’s disability in an action in mandamus, the moving party must demonstrate that the commission’s decision was rendered without some evidence in support thereof. State, ex rel. Burley, v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 18, 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E. 2d 936; State, ex rel. Elliott, v. Indus. Comm. (1986), 26 Ohio St. 3d 76, 26 OBR 66, 497 N.E. 2d 70. The appellate court below determined that appellee had sustained this burden by demonstrating that the commission had no evidence before…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Miller v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Kaska v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Matlack, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State ex rel. Foreman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Miller v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.