Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Foreman v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1992No. 1990-1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 64 Ohio St.3d 70.] THE STATE, EX REL. FOREMAN, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; MTD PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Foreman, v. Indus. Comm.,
1992-Ohio-3.] Workers' compensation—Doctor report is "some evidence" supporting denial of temporary total disability compensation for the period following the examination. (No. 90-1920—Submitted April 7, 1992—Decided June 17, 1992.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 89AP-70. __________________ {¶ 1} Claimant-appellee, Kelvin Lee Foreman, was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Kaska v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Delk v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Foreman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Findlay Ind. v. Ind. Commission of Oh., 08ap-584 (5-5-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State ex rel. Staples The Office Superstore E., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Carey v. Am. Seaway Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999