Legal Opinion

Ho Gate Wah v. Fong Wan

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1953No. Civ. 15337PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

This is an appeal from a decree in a proceeding for declaratory relief.

On February 22, 1949, a written contract was entered into between appellant Fong Wan as the party of the first part and six Chinese actors, all of whom are described therein as citizens and residents of China (one of whom is respondent Ho Gate Wah), as the parties of the second part.

The contract recites that Fong Wan owns and operates several night clubs; that the six actors perform acrobatic acts; that Fong Wan desires to engage them to perform in his night clubs in San Francisco and Oakland “and for other persons in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adams v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bloss v. RahillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Kessloff v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Rolapp v. Federal Building & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Giese v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Bess v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Fries v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Kraemer v. Superior Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API