Legal Opinion
Giese v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1946No. Civ. 15303PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action against defendants for declaratory relief to determine whether or not the civil service position which the former holds as Superintendent of Automotive Equipment of the Los Angeles Eire Department entitles him to the benefits of the Fire and Police Pension Fund as provided by article XVII, sections 180 to 189 of the Charter of the City of Los Angeles.
By its declaratory relief judgment in favor of plaintiff, the trial court decreed that plaintiff is a member of the Fire Department of the City of Los Angeles, duly and regularly appointed thereto under civil…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurley v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- McKeag v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Haas v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Knoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Ho Gate Wah v. Fong WanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Dunlop v. Hersum Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Abrams v. Colonial Life Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1966