United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lee Investment LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider whether a federal district court had subject matter jurisdiction over an insurance company’s diversity action seeking rescission of a workers’ compensation policy and, if so, whether it was required to dismiss the case because exclusive jurisdiction was vested by state law in a state workers’ compensation agency. We conclude that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction and properly denied the motion to dismiss. We affirm.
I
This seemingly ab aetemo litigation originated in a simple event: an accident at “The Island,” a…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Kwan v. SanMedica InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mary Tatum v. Steven MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Wilson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Westport Ins. Corp. v. California Casualty Mgt.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Hernandez v. DMSI Staffing, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.