Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McGee

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 2000No. 58 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1999PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

We allowed appeal to consider whether constitutional double jeopardy principles barred a prisoner’s criminal prosecution predicated upon misconduct for which he previously had been subjected to disciplinary confinement.

On September 25,1996, prison officials conducted an administrative search of the person of Appellant Ferman McGee (“McGee”), an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Rockview, during which they discovered an eyeglass stem, the tip of which could be removed to reveal a sharp wire. Pursuant to prison regulations, corrections authorities initiated…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. FarrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. ViglioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. ConstantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API