Legal Opinion · Dissent

Muckenthaler v. Noller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1919No. 21,955Published

Appeal from Wabaunsee district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.

1DissentBurch, J.

(dissenting) : I am unable to concur in an opinion which, in my judgment, has the effect of a judicial repeal of a perfectly plain statute. The statute reads as follows:

“When a right of action is barred by the provisions of any statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of action or ground of defense.” (Civ. Code, § 24, Gen. Stat. 1915, § 6914.)

This is the concluding section of the general statute of limitations. In this state statutes of limitation are statutes of repose. For a variety of reasons it is considered bad policy to permit court investigation of old woes, and so the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. BohSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Coale v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Gibson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Hogaboom v. FlowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Stump v. BurnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API