State v. Houston
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the following reasons.
App.R. 26(B)(2)(b) requires that an application for reopening establish “a showing of good cause for untimely filing if the application is filed more than ninety days after journalization of the appellate judgment.” Appellant’s application to reopen was not filed until nearly one year after journalization of the appellate judgment. Appellant claims that he was denied access to his trial transcript, which allegedly prevented him from discovering his appellate counsel’s deficiencies in a timely manner. However, the basis…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Landrum v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Houston v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.