Legal Opinion

State v. Houston

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1995No. 95-600PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the following reasons.

App.R. 26(B)(2)(b) requires that an application for reopening establish “a showing of good cause for untimely filing if the application is filed more than ninety days after journalization of the appellate judgment.” Appellant’s application to reopen was not filed until nearly one year after journalization of the appellate judgment. Appellant claims that he was denied access to his trial transcript, which allegedly prevented him from discovering his appellate counsel’s deficiencies in a timely manner. However, the basis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Landrum v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  3. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Houston v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API