Legal Opinion
State v. Bell
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1995No. 95-349PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the following reasons.
App.R. 26(B) states in part:
“(1) A defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. An application for reopening shall be filed in the court where the appeal was decided within ninety days from journalization of the appellate judgment unless the applicant shows good cause for filing at a later time.
*34“(2) An application for reopening shall contain all of the following:
« $ * $
“(b) A showing of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Jamison v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Houston v. Warden, Warren Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.