Legal Opinion
Landrum v. Anderson
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 4, 2002No. C-1-96-641PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration Concerning the Court’s Denying Expansion of the Record (Doc. No. 140). Respondent has opposed the Motion (Doc. No. 145) and Petitioner has filed a Reply Memorandum in support (Doc. No. 146). It is clear from the docket context that this Motion is directed to the Magistrate Judge, as opposed to the two roughly concurrent appeals taken to District Judge Weber from Magistrate Judge Orders denying…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edwards v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ronnie Lee Maupin v. Steve Smith, Superintendent, Kentucky State Reformatory and Steven L. Beshear, Attorney General of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Ford v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landrum v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Moore v. MitchellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Stojetz v. IsheeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Davie v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.