Legal Opinion

In Re Mitgang

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1944No. 27402. Respondent censuredPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn

A complaint was brought against respondent, Henry Mitgang, by the Chicago Bar Association to investigate certain practices alleged to be unprofessional and contrary to law, for the purpose of disbarring him.

It charged that in 1931 he entered into an agreement with two laymen, by which they agreed to solicit personal injury and death claims for him, and that he agreed to pay them as compensation a portion of the attorney fees which he might be paid in such cases; and that for a number of years such persons solicited and procured claims, as the result of which respondent was retained to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunter v. TroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In Re NeedhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. AmosIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. McCallumIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Chreste v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re HeirichIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. In Re KrasnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re WittIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re DonaghyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API