State v. Runyan
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.
Defendant was charged with the sale of intoxicating liq-uor to Ole Sloan. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying new trial. In his brief he makes the following points:
“(1) That the information does not state a public offense. (2) Misconduct of the state’s attorney. (3) That the state’s attorney cross-examined a state’s witness. (4) That one of the jurors was not a citizen. (5) Insufficiency of the evidence.
Under the first point he urges that the charge that he willfully and unlawfully sold intoxicating liquors to Ole Sloan contrary to the form of the statute,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. La MontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. LaymonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. WorkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. EamesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Hansen v. BootsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. ComesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. DegnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Sioux Falls v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Miles v. Fall River CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.