State v. Degner
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.
Defendant was found guilty by the verdict of a jury upon an information charging him with the offense of selling intoxicating liquor. From judgment pronounced upon said verdict, and from denial of his motion for new trial, he has appealed!
Appellant seeks to predicate error upon claimed mis conduct of the state’s attorney in propounding a certain interrogatory to a character witness called by appellant. The assignment of error upon this point is entitled to no consideration because it entirely fails to refer to any specification of error upon which it is based. See Rule 4, Supreme Court Rules.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WilcoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. FulwiderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. HanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. RunyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. McCrearySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. HoughtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Tufty v. Sioux Transit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. NormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. MostadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.