State v. Work
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGate’S, J.
'Defendant was convicted of the crime of keep- and storing intoxicating liquor, with intent to evade the prohibitory law (Rev. Code 1919, § 10299). He appeals from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.
A search of appellant’s farm was made by a deputy sheriff and his party. On the premises were found two stills, from 75 to 100 small 'jars, somte of them containing traces of whiskey, and five ioo-pound sacks of sugar. Across the highway on state land leased by appellant in small haystacks belonging to appellant, were found four one-gallon jugs, and two bottles of moonshine whiskey.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CondonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RunyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. ThiemeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Sioux Falls v. MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.