Legal Opinion

State v. Hanks

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1929No. File No. 6710PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

The information on which appellant was convicted sufficiently charges appellant with the larceny of a hog in McCook county on March 5, 1927, and' contained no allegations of previous convictions. When the opening statement was being made, appellant objected thus:

“We object and except to the ¡State’s Attorney’s- statement wherein he said ‘we expect to show the defendant was charged *64with Grand Larceny in Perkins County, South Dakota, and that a plea of Petit Larceny, was entered, and that other charges were preferred against him in this County/ for the reason they are incompetent,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paulson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. State v. FergusonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. FulwiderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. La MontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. McCrearySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. WebbSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. NormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. NevilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API