Legal Opinion

Staub v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 18, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

Howard R. Staub brought this action of replevin to recover an automobile, claiming right of possession. The United States marshal for the district of Connecticut had seized the automobile on November 9, 1960, under a writ of execution issued pursuant to a judgment which had been rendered against Staub in an admiralty action in the United States District Court for the district of Connecticut. The marshal gave notice to Staub that he would sell the automobile on November 23, 1960. The car was, in fact, sold on November 22, 1960, to Rudolph Anderson, who gave it to his wife, the defendant. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Steam Stone-Cutter Co. v. SearsUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
  3. R. v. Archawski, Libellants-Appellees v. Basil Hanioti Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Morey v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Staub v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Stankiewicz v. HawkesConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
  3. Stankiewicz v. HawkesConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
  4. Thames River Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Security Windows, Inc. (In re Thames River Associates Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API