Legal Opinion

Hall v. Dolph and Watkins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This proceeding was instituted on behalf of the State of Oregon by the Governor, Secretary of State, and Treasurer, constituting the Oregon State Board of Control, against Henry V. Dolph, and others, for a. decree .providing as follows: 1) That neither Frank E. Watkins nor M. J. Larue, named as defendants, nor their heirs or assigns, have any interest in Lots Five and Six, Block Fifteen, Portland, by reason of Item VI of the will of Frank M. Mulkey, deceased, or otherwise,- and (2) that the words contained in Item II of said will, by which the testator expresses the hope that an office…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Loomis Institute v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Cooke v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. San Felipe Independent School Dist. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bergsvik v. BergsvikOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Whitney v. Canadian Bank of CommerceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Whitney v. Canadian Bank of CommerceOregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API