Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Canadian Bank of Commerce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the State of Oregon, intervenor, from a part of a decree of the circuit court. Before quoting the part of the decree challenged by the appeal, we state that ORS 19.023 authorizes appeals from parts of judgments and decrees (see also ORS 19.005 (2)). Hall et al v. Dolph et al and Watkins et al, 184 Or 319, 198 P 2d 272, illustrates the operation of partial appeals and indicates that the appellant *3is not handicapped by the fact that he appeals from only a part. The decree ruled that the defendant, Canadian Bank of Commerce:

“* * * pay over to W. Stanley Welbom as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grignon v. ShopeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hall v. Dolph and WatkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCarton v. Estate of WatsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Whisnant v. WhisnantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Whitney v. Canadian Bank of CommerceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Whitney v. Canadian Bank of CommerceOregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API