Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Canadian Bank of Commerce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

232 Or. 1 (1962)

374 P.2d 441

WHITNEY

v.

CANADIAN BANK OF COMMERCE AND STATE LAND BOARD

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued January 11, 1962.

Reargued May 10, 1962.

Reversed September 6, 1962.

Catherine Zorn, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for intervenor-appellant. With her on the briefs was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.

Ben F. Forbes, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

REVERSED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the State of Oregon, intervenor, from…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Chadwick v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Devol v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Thomas' Adm'r v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  5. Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API