Legal Opinion
Store Safe Redlands Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 11, 1996No. 93-85LPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Store Safe Redlands Associates, Ltd. (Store Safe), has alleged a government taking of its property in three claims: (1) a physical or regulatory taking of vested range stock water rights; (2) a temporary taking of vested irrigation water rights of the North and South Twin Rivers; and (3) a taking of vested and decreed irrigation water rights of the Wisconsin, Summit, Last Chance, and Ophir Creeks (Four Canyons). Currently, this case is before the court on the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and the defendant’s cross motion for summary…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Diamond Bar Cattle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Devon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Eastern Minerals International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.